This is going to be a rarity, a different kind of post for me. I am just a person asked to help maintain this website since I happen to read a lot of news from around the globe and care about human freedom, the U.S. Constitution and equal justice. Occasionally I write some original blogs but mainly I just repost stories I find interesting that I feel help demonstrate the overall tapestry of collectivism descending upon this once free country. I try not to get into subject matter that is too “conspiratorial” in that there is a natural aversion to explanations that fall outside of the mainstream, and by that I really mean tightly controlled establishment media. Today, I may slightly cross that path and speak honestly after reading the White House National Security Strategy released in May of this year.
The people currently making national security strategies care not of your security when that strategy spends more time out plans to fight global warming and veiled language regarding population control (sustainable development – U.N. Agenda 21) than it does on actual security issues. How can a national security strategy contain more about international order, education and global warming than it does about the use of force? There is only one small section devoted to the use of force, so how can this be a sincere attempt aimed at protecting your life and liberty from the indomitable dangers we are constantly told we face?
Use of Force
Military force, at times, may be necessary to defend our country and allies or to preserve broader peace and security, including by protecting civilians facing a grave humanitarian crisis. We will draw on diplomacy, development, and international norms and institutions to help resolve disagreements, prevent conflict, and maintain peace, mitigating where possible the need for the use of force. This means credibly underwriting U.S. defense commitments with tailored approaches to deterrence and ensuring the U.S. military continues to have the necessary capabilities across all domains—land, air, sea, space, and cyber. It also includes helping our allies and partners build capacity to fulfill their responsibilities to contribute to regional and global security.
While the use of force is sometimes necessary, we will exhaust other options before war whenever we can, and carefully weigh the costs and risks of action against the costs and risks of inaction. When force is necessary, we will continue to do so in a way that reflects our values and strengthens our legitimacy, and we will seek broad international support, working with such institutions as NATO and the U.N. Security Council.
The United States must reserve the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend our nation and our interests, yet we will also seek to adhere to standards that govern the use of force. Doing so strengthens those who act in line with international standards, while isolating and weakening those who do not. We will also outline a clear mandate and specific objectives and thoroughly consider the consequences —intended and unintended—of our actions. And the United States will take care when sending the men and women of our Armed Forces into harm’s way to ensure they have the leadership, training, and equipment they require accomplishing their mission.
In times past a national security strategy was about one thing, keeping you safe from invaders from overseas. Anthropogenic Global Warming is not only junk science, it is a Trojan Horse for population control since the cheapest and easiest way to combat all that CO2 is to stop your exhalations by stopping your procreation. Our current national security strategy is more an outline to global fascism-Marxism than it is about your legitimate safety concerns.
Destruction is the name of the game. War with Iran is another tool coming out of the shed. This one is a hammer drill. War in Iran will be more devastating to the US than a nuclear Iran. It is not a war that can be won without nuclear Armageddon. Russia and China will likely have something to say about that due to the proximity of Iran to those nation’s borders. Additionally, Iran is in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. The military brass inside the Joint Chiefs, particularly Admiral Mullen has always been cautious about the effects of a strike against Iran (which can and will close the Straights of Hormuz which would be a bloody nightmare to open). Iran is on much more solid footing with Russia and China than we are despite economic myths of an inseparable symbiotic trading relationship between the U.S. and China. World War I was totally avoidable and was a collectivist agenda. World War II would have therefore been avoidable. This could pan out to be World War III and this is certainly avoidable as well, but the global fascists seem intent on pursuing global warming as a security strategy over prudent foreign policy. If national security was truly the chief concern, and nuclear arms in Iranian hands would mean sure fire preemptive attack by the Iranians on an unsuspecting and peaceful neighbor, you might one would rejoice over the comments of Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast made last week about cooperating with “any country,” including the United States, in building nuclear power plants in Iran.
“These are big economic projects and there will certainly be much competition between different countries,” he said.
If people say it is crazy to think destruction is the aim, please consider the following post here and here. There can be no political reorganization into global collectivism until the old world is destroyed. There is no political reorganization without economic reorganization. They can not achieve their new global model of governing divinely from on high until they destroy the bastions standing in the way, mainly the U.S. Constitution and the remnants of free society not yet indoctrinated into collectivism. Globalist inside our own government and in “steering committees” and “think tanks” such as the C.F.R. or Tri-Lateral Commission could care less about the U.S. or its people. You are an impediment. They make money through a printing press, elitist bailouts and corporate welfare while cutting your jobs, telling you it is the “new normal” and that you must suck from the teat of government. It is a complete myth and fallacy that these ruling class elite need the U.S. or their “free markets” for their profits. Monopoly is the objective and consolidation is occurring now, exactly as the plutocratic oligarchs desire. Consolidation of power in happening in central corporatist bureaucratic shills and consolidation of market space is also occurring, for a good example just look to the way the Treasury and the Federal Reserve help to alleviate troublesome Goldman and Merrill competition. Its not just on Wall Street, the media has been consolidated through a series of steps, so has the food suppliers all the while small upstarts are crowed out since they can’t fund their own Congressman or they are too busy filling out 1099’s on purchases over $600 to compete. The only people losing their behind live outside ruling class elite circles.
I firmly believe this is all designed, if that makes me a “conspiracy theorist” to some I will always listen to your evidence to the contrary. Humans are herd animals and I don’t like the feeling of being outside of the herd any more than the next, so by all mean, please, convince me this is not a design. Day by day I find more about the design as it comes into focus with each new piece of information. Every attempt I have to try to reel back in and find something to lead me to believe this is coincidence or just a bunch of morons running the show is met with more evidence and connections to the contrary. The “nudges” are deliberate and the current rhetoric makes me believe Iran is going to be one huge shove into the arms of the New World Order.
“The technocratic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” – Zbigniew Brzezinski
Control is preceded by chaos. Without the traditional values to restrain heinous collaborations with the intent of control, what is stopping the ruling class and what beholds them to the public the supposedly serve? A chief belief of V.I. Lenin was one could not be a true revolutionary with any attachment to friends, family or a traditional moral conscience.